Judge again blocks above-ground White House ballroom construction while allowing some underground security work
The Facts
- Judge Richard Leon ruled Thursday that above-ground construction on the White House ballroom project must stop.
- Leon allowed below-ground construction tied to national security facilities, including a bunker, to continue.
- The judge said the ballroom project requires congressional approval before it can proceed.
- Leon issued the clarified ruling after a federal appeals court instructed him to reconsider or clarify the national-security implications of his earlier order.
- The Trump administration argued that the project includes national-security features and sought to justify broader construction on that basis, but Leon rejected using national security as a blanket exception for the whole ballroom.
- The planned ballroom has been described as a 90,000-square-foot project costing about $400 million.
- The project is planned for the site of the White House East Wing, which was demolished for the ballroom project.
Context
What construction can still continue under the judge's order?
Leon said below-ground work on national security facilities, including a bunker, may continue. He also allowed only the above-ground work strictly necessary to cover, secure, and protect those underground facilities, so long as it does not lock in the ballroom's final size and scale PBS.org,Aol,CNBC.
Why did the judge issue a new ruling instead of leaving his earlier order in place?
The revised order followed direction from a federal appeals court, which told Leon to clarify or reconsider how his earlier construction halt affected asserted national-security needs at the site PBS.org,Aol,Daily Mail.
Who challenged the ballroom project in court?
According to BBC's report, the National Trust for Historic Preservation sued over the project, arguing the White House began construction without required planning and environmental steps and without congressional authorization BBC.
View all 100 sources
Wire services (8)
Independent coverage (50)
About these frames
See this differently than someone you know would? Two ways to keep it going.
The dial works on any URL — paste an article you read elsewhere this week.