EU court backs Italy in Meta dispute over payments for use of news content
The Facts
- The case before the EU court stemmed from Meta’s challenge to a decision or rules issued by Italy’s communications regulator, AGCOM, concerning payment to press publishers for online use of news content.
- The Court of Justice of the European Union held that member states may provide for press publishers to receive equitable remuneration from online platforms that use their press publications.
- The court said such remuneration is admissible when it is the economic counterpart for authorization to reproduce press publications or make them available to the public online.
- The ruling also said publishers must be able to deny authorization for use of their content or allow that use free of charge, meaning payment cannot be required where no authorization is needed or where permission is granted without charge.
- Multiple reports say the dispute concerns Italy’s implementation of the EU’s 2019 copyright directive on copyright and related rights in the digital single market.
- The decision has implications beyond Italy because outlets report that the court’s interpretation applies across the European Union and clarifies the legal framework for platform-publisher negotiations over news content.
How left and right are reading this
- Both agree
- The ruling clarifies that publishers can be paid for online use of news content only where payment is tied to authorization, while preserving publishers’ control to refuse permission or allow use for free across a framework that now matters beyond Italy.
- They split on
- Less a disagreement than a question of emphasis: a stronger bargaining position for publishers seeking payment from platforms, versus the court’s limiting principle that remuneration cannot be imposed whenever news content appears online.
Context
What was Meta arguing in this case?
Meta challenged the Italian regime and AGCOM’s role in setting criteria for publisher compensation, arguing that Italy’s approach conflicted with EU copyright rules and, according to some reports, infringed its freedom to conduct business Yahoo! Finance,La Razón,Público.es.
Does the ruling mean platforms must always pay when news content appears online?
No. The court said equitable remuneration is allowed when it is the economic counterpart for authorization to use press publications, but publishers must also be free to refuse authorization or grant it free of charge, and payment cannot be demanded where no authorization is required eldiario.es,elEconomista.es,El Diario Vasco.
Why does this matter outside Italy?
The ruling interprets EU law, and several outlets say it is binding across the EU, giving guidance to other countries and to publishers and platforms negotiating over the use of news content under the bloc’s copyright framework EL PAÍS,La Voz de Galicia,LesEchos.fr.
View all 53 sources
Wire services (1)
Independent coverage (50)
About these frames
See this differently than someone you know would? Two ways to keep it going.
The dial works on any URL — paste an article you read elsewhere this week.