Virginia court ruling and new state maps shift the House redistricting landscape toward Republicans
The Facts
- The Virginia Supreme Court struck down a voter-approved measure tied to new congressional districts in a 4-3 decision.
- The court said the legislative process used to place the measure before voters violated Virginia's constitution, which invalidated the referendum's legal effect.
- Democrats had backed the Virginia redraw because they believed it could help them gain as many as four U.S. House seats in the state.
- Recent court rulings and newly drawn maps have improved Republicans' overall position in the national redistricting fight ahead of the midterm elections.
- The stakes extend beyond Virginia because control of the U.S. House is closely tied to how congressional districts are drawn in multiple states.
- Additional redistricting fights are still underway or being considered in other states, so the congressional map for the midterms is not yet fully settled.
How left and right are reading this
- Both agree
- A narrow Virginia ruling changed the practical effect of a voter-approved redistricting measure in a fight where House control can turn on district lines across multiple states and the map for the midterms is still unsettled.
- They split on
- Whether the story is about representation being reshaped by court-driven map decisions, or about constitutional procedure setting the limits on which voter-approved redistricting changes can legally take effect.
Context
What did the Virginia court actually decide?
The Virginia Supreme Court ruled that lawmakers did not follow the required constitutional procedure when advancing the redistricting measure, so the voter-approved referendum could not take legal effect Fox News,Guardian.
Why does this matter for control of the House?
The Virginia map was part of Democrats' effort to improve their chances in House races, and its removal came as Republicans were also gaining from other recent rulings and map changes, affecting the broader balance of competitive and party-leaning districts before the midterms NYT,NYT,NYT.
View all 100 sources
Wire services (2)
Independent coverage (50)
About these frames
See this differently than someone you know would? Two ways to keep it going.
The dial works on any URL — paste an article you read elsewhere this week.