Two Jan. 6 officers sue to block Justice Department anti-weaponization fund
The Facts
- Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges sued in federal court in Washington, D.C., to block the Justice Department's anti-weaponization fund.
- Dunn is a retired U.S. Capitol Police officer and Hodges is a Metropolitan Police Department officer who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack.
- The lawsuit asks a judge to find the fund's creation illegal and to reverse Treasury Department transfers made to the Justice Department to implement it.
- The anti-weaponization fund totals about $1.776 billion and was created as part of a settlement connected to Trump's lawsuit over leaked tax returns.
- The officers contend the fund could compensate Jan. 6 defendants or groups tied to political violence, which they say would put them at further risk.
- Administration officials have not ruled out Jan. 6 defendants being eligible to apply for money from the fund.
- How the fund will determine eligibility and distribute payments remains unclear, and the commissioners who will oversee awards had not been announced in the cited coverage.
How left and right are reading this
- Both agree
- A $1.776 billion Justice Department fund is being stood up with basic questions about eligibility, award decisions, and oversight still unresolved, while officials have not ruled out Jan. 6 defendants applying for money.
- They split on
- Less a disagreement than a question of emphasis: the risk that public money could reach people tied to political violence and endanger those harmed, versus the broader failure of institutional restraint in launching a large program before its rules and overseers are clear.
Context
What is the anti-weaponization fund?
It is a roughly $1.776 billion Justice Department compensation fund created this week as part of a settlement tied to Trump's lawsuit over leaked tax returns. The administration has described it as a fund for people who say they were unfairly targeted or prosecuted by the federal government Hill,Newsweek.
Why are the officers challenging it?
Dunn and Hodges argue the fund is unlawful and say it could send taxpayer money to Jan. 6 defendants or allied groups, which they contend would encourage further threats and violence against officers like them Axios,CBS News,Al Jazeera Online.
What is still unresolved?
It remains unclear who will ultimately qualify for payments, how awards will be decided, and whether the officers have legal standing to stop the program in court. Coverage also says the administration had not announced the commissioners who would oversee payouts NBC News,POLITICO.
View all 100 sources
Wire services (15)
Independent coverage (50)
About these frames
See this differently than someone you know would? Two ways to keep it going.
The dial works on any URL — paste an article you read elsewhere this week.